Prediction of Arthur Nagel [] vs Tim Heger [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W W L
Form
W W L W L L L W L LH2H: Nagel 1 - 0 Heger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagel winning 2 and Heger winning 0. The last match between Nagel and Heger was at the M15 Ueberlingen, 17-08-2023, Second, Clay with Arthur Nagel getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arthur Nagel | 1 |
| Tim Heger | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Arthur Nagel
Player
Tim Heger
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:10:0 | Average Match Time | 2:10:0 |
| 69% (60/87) | 1st Serve % | 62% (49/79) |
| 65% (39/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (37/49) |
| 63% (17/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 37% (29/79) | Return Points Win % | 36% (31/87) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Arthur Nagel vs Tim Heger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagel 1 - 0 Heger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagel has won 48.59% of points on their second serve, while Heger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagel, in recent form, has won 51.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Heger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.59% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagel has saved 52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagel has won 68.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 18), with Heger winning 33.33% (W/L 1/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 44/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 18/ 15). Heger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 28/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.97% of matches (W/L 40/ 18), where as Heger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagel winning 1 times and Heger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagel winning 2 and Heger winning 0. The last match between Nagel and Heger was at the M15 Ueberlingen, 17-08-2023, Second, Clay with Arthur Nagel getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagel and Heger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nagel winning 0 times and Heger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nagel winning 1, and Heger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagel has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.19 while Heger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagel has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagel has converted 43.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Arthur Nagel vs Tim Heger Best Odds For The Match
Arthur Nagel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Michel Hopp
Player
Arthur Nagel
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Damien Wenger
75%
(
69 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Andrea Bacaloni
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Arthur Nagel
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
55
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Jasza Szajrych
86%
(
62 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Arthur Nagel
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Niccolo Catini
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Heger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Tim Heger
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
10
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 4-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dax Donders
Player
Tim Heger
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Tim Heger
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Heger
Player
Nikita Mashtakov
74%
(
75 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
90)
4
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
5
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
12%
(
3 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Heger
Player
Enrico Giacomini
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Nagel vs Heger?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Nagel Vs Heger is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (68/40) | Win/Loss | 49% (111/114) |
| 60% (147/100) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (255/252) |
| 55% (1269/1056) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2496/2487) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 293 | Aces Total | 395 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 221 | Total Double Faults | 477 |
| 1:14:58 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 289.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 274.35 |
| 64% (3649/5746) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4055/6777) |
| 66% (2418/3649) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2761/4055) |
| 49% (1036/2097) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1150/2727) |
| 42% (250/591) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (281/691) |
| 41% (2274/5588) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2689/6774) |
| 62% (66/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (110/223) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (11/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (24/44) |
| 59% (19/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (25/59) |
| 90% (67/60) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (116/98) |
| 10% (67/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (116/18) |
| 18% (40/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (109/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
